- Sort records into owned outright, owned with conditions, and excluded before a buyer sees anything.
- Check employment, contractor, client, outsourcing, and platform agreements for ownership and confidentiality clauses.
- Personal information is removed or replaced rather than licensed; the rights question is whether your notices and local law permit the use.
- Regulated categories (health, legal, payment, tax, screening) are usually excluded as a class with the workflow around them licensed.
Access is not permission
The fact that records sit in your systems does not mean you can license them. Some belong to clients. Some are covered by contracts you signed years ago. Some contain information about people who never agreed to anything. Some are regulated. A good manifest sorts records into what you can license cleanly, what you can license with conditions, and what stays out.
This checklist is the sorting process. It is not legal advice, and the last step on every item is your own counsel. What it does is make sure the right questions get asked before a buyer sees anything, so the deal does not fall apart in diligence.
Ownership: is it yours?
Start with who created the record and under what arrangement.
- Employee work product is normally the company's. Check that employment agreements say so, especially for staff in jurisdictions where the default runs the other way.
- Contractor work product is the contractor's unless an agreement assigns it. Code, designs, and documents written by contractors without an IP assignment are excluded until that is fixed.
- Client-owned deliverables. Many service contracts assign the final deliverable to the client. Your process records around it (proposals, drafts, reviews, internal notes) are usually still yours.
- Third-party content such as vendor manuals, licensed templates, stock assets, and anything copied from a platform is not yours to license onward.
- Acquired companies. Records from an acquisition are yours if the purchase agreement transferred them. Check the schedule.
Contracts: what did you promise?
Pull the agreements that touch the records in scope and look for four kinds of clause.
- Confidentiality. Most customer and client agreements restrict disclosure of the other party's information. De-identification often satisfies this, but some clauses are drafted broadly enough to require consent or exclusion. Standalone NDAs usually mean exclusion.
- Data ownership and use. Outsourcing, BPO, and managed-service contracts frequently state that interaction data belongs to the client. If so, licensing needs the client's consent or scope limited to your own operational records.
- Vendor and platform terms. Your CRM, helpdesk, and chat providers have terms that govern export and reuse. Most permit export of your own data; a few restrict commercial redistribution. Read the current version.
- Exclusivity you already granted. If you have licensed records before, check whether that license was exclusive and for what field.
Where a clause is unclear, the conservative answer is to exclude the affected records from the manifest and revisit once counsel has read the agreement. Excluded records can be added later; a breach cannot be undone.
People: whose information is in it?
Operational records are full of personal information: customer names, employee names, contact details, sometimes much more. Licensing does not require that information. De-identification removes or replaces it before any sample is built. The rights question is whether your privacy notices and the law where people live permit the use.
- Customers and contacts. Check your privacy notice and the law in your customers' jurisdictions. De-identified data is treated differently from personal data in most frameworks, and the de-identification standard in the contract should be one your counsel accepts.
- Employees. Their messages and work product are in nearly every record type. Employee privacy notices and, in some countries, works-council or union consultation apply. Direct messages and HR matters are excluded by default.
- Callers. Recorded calls need a consent record. Two-party-consent jurisdictions require that the notice was given at the time. Audio is more sensitive than transcripts.
- Candidates, tenants, patients, and other individuals with their own regulatory protections are covered under the next heading.
Regulated categories
Some records carry rules that go beyond ordinary privacy law. The usual approach is to exclude the regulated content as a class and license the workflow around it.
| Category | What applies | Usual treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Health information | HIPAA in the US, equivalents elsewhere; business associate agreements | Clinical content excluded; administrative workflows de-identified to the HIPAA standard |
| Legal matters | Attorney-client privilege, work product, professional conduct rules | Privileged classes excluded entirely; firm-authored precedents and process records licensed |
| Payment data | PCI DSS | Card and bank numbers removed outright |
| Tax return information | IRC section 7216 for US preparers | Return information excluded; procedures and non-return correspondence licensed |
| Candidate and tenant screening | Anti-discrimination and fair-housing law | Screening decisions excluded or heavily restricted; workflow records around them licensed |
| Children's data | COPPA and equivalents | Excluded |
| Financial services customer data | GLBA and equivalents | Excluded or de-identified with counsel review |
This table is a starting point, not a complete list, and the rules change. Your counsel decides what applies to you.
Platform terms
Two platform questions come up in nearly every deal. First, does your software vendor's agreement allow you to export and license your own data? For the mainstream business systems the answer is generally yes, with the caveat that data the vendor supplied, such as enrichment fields or benchmark data, is theirs. Second, did any records originate on a third-party platform whose terms restrict reuse? Profile data copied from a professional network, listings pulled from a multiple listing service, and content scraped from the web are the common cases, and they are excluded. Your own notes about those records are yours.
Writing it into the manifest
The manifest is where the checklist lands. For each system and record type it records three things: the rights basis (owned outright, owned with conditions, or excluded), the exclusions applied (by class, by counterparty, by date), and the de-identification rules. Buyers read this section first, because it tells them whether a deal can close. A manifest with clear rights and sensible exclusions attracts better offers than a larger one with open questions.
If your counsel has not seen a data license before, the licensing 101 guide and the glossary are a useful briefing. If you want to know how rights clarity affects price, read what drives value.
Questions this guide raises
Does de-identification solve the confidentiality problem?
Often, but not always. Many confidentiality clauses are satisfied once the counterparty cannot be identified. Some are drafted broadly enough that consent or exclusion is the safe route. Your counsel reads the clause; the manifest records the decision.
What if we find a problem after the deal closes?
A well-drafted license has a procedure for it: notice to the buyer, removal of the affected records from the supplied copy, and in serious cases a cure period or termination. It is far cheaper to exclude a doubtful class before the manifest goes out than to invoke that procedure later.
Do you check our rights for us?
We help you build the manifest and we ask the questions on this checklist, but we do not give legal advice and we do not decide what you are permitted to license. Your counsel does. Every seller we represent has counsel review the manifest before buyers see it.
Informational only. This guide does not provide legal, tax, or compliance advice. Whether a specific set of records can be licensed is a decision for your counsel. Measured from a complete data manifest. A first offer is a process target, not a guarantee; buyers decide eligibility, price, and terms.